The Ranting Wren The Wren Forum Banner
The Glorious Wren The Movie Wren The Photo Wren Old Man Wren

I have blathered excessively to friends about my disappointment over the lack of availability of the Nokia 6230 through our corporate AT&T representatives, and I am about to do something I do not want to do. I am about to order something other than Nokia.

I have always had a Nokia cell phone (okay, except for my first cell, a Qualcomm brick thing). I have yet to find a phone with the intelligent user interface features of the Nokias. Nokias, like Macs, are a pleasure to use, and work exactly like a cell phone should. Finding names in the phone book and entering message text, potentially the most tedious and frustrating of activities, are simplest on a Nokia.

But I am now asking myself if perhaps a little frustration with the user interface will be a fair exchange for having a phone with the features I want and a tad more technical reliability.

I have to be 100% honest here to say that, beautiful interface and pleasureness to use aside, most of my Nokias have had one or another kind of strange technical glitch. My tiny blue one would freeze and need to be re-set by removing the battery. Two of them have had headphone profile freezing problems, the phones thinking a headphone was attached when there was none there. And my current phone turns itself off if handled or jostled a certain way.

I do not know if any other phone makers have more reliability as far as bugs and glitches go, but I wonder if I should try. The Motorola Razr is looking awfully nice and has the features I want, but it’s a Motorola, and using Motorolas is a pain in the ass. It’s also a clamshell, which I find inconvenient and unnecessary. I’ve poked around my boss’ Sony Ericsson, and it’s cool, but suffers from its own interface ugliness. Is it worth suffering through the poor UI features of these phones to get something more reliable and full of the technical features I desire?

I could of course merge my Palm with my phone and, finally, have all my info and my phone in one device. But the Treo 650, while immensely cool, is relatively huge. I want the tiniest phone possible, since I carry my phone in my pocket at all times. The Treo would not fit very comfortably in my jeans, and it has an external antenna. Snap!

Why can’t I just get the phone I want? Why do I have to go through this nonsense? Or—and this is the most important question—why do I care so much? My life would be easier and I’d be more relaxed if I didn’t give a flying crap what kind of phone I had. That the tiny details of industrial and interface design cause me so much stress is a bane, and I wonder if I should just let it all go.

Long pause.

I of course am dreaming. Details matter to me, and I think they always will. Perhaps what I really need to do is move beyond accepting the fact that I am too picky and through to the admission that not everything will meet my draconian standards of quality. In accepting that most things are made like garbage, perhaps therein I will find relaxation.

So, is it a Razr, a Treo, or wait another 46 months for a 6230? Decision time.

16 Comments

John Expounded Thusly:

My thoughts are this:

It’s a cell phone. Don’t worry so much about your technology. Doing so prevents you from worrying about important things, like whether you have just blown your nose when you shake someone’s hand.

Tuesday, January 18th, 2005 • 1:46pm • Permalink

Rodney Expounded Thusly:

Nokia needs to read this and send you a free phone – for this is the epitome of Brand loyalty.

Wednesday, January 19th, 2005 • 10:05am • Permalink

D.M. Expounded Thusly:

…or wait and take telepathy classes.

Wednesday, January 19th, 2005 • 4:27pm • Permalink

John Expounded Thusly:

I just read that there is research being done into implanting earpieces behind people’s ears so they always have a mobile/cellular connection. So, maybe telepathy isn’t far away.

Wednesday, January 19th, 2005 • 8:25pm • Permalink

DYS Expounded Thusly:

Wow, now if they could add a mini-toaster and pop-tart dispenser, I’d be all set!

Wednesday, January 19th, 2005 • 9:11pm • Permalink

SAMerican Revolution Expounded Thusly:

Get a Motorola. I used the freakin’ Star Tac so long people actually started making fun of me for being retro. They work well, Stevie.

Or, I say we bring back those huge beige thingys we had in the early 90’s. BIG is the new small.

Thursday, January 20th, 2005 • 2:10am • Permalink

Barbie Expounded Thusly:

Get a Princess phone for your bedroom and just lounge around all day gossiping with friends. Really, do we need more than that as a species?

Thursday, January 20th, 2005 • 11:38am • Permalink

Steve Expounded Thusly:

Okay, I have asked the cell phone lady at work if I can get a Razr. I tried one out last night, and while it has some stupid-ass limitations and the system font is hard to read (bad for text messages!), it’s very thin and seems sturdy. It also looks VERY cool! So now I have to buy all-new accessories. Sigh. I fully expect her to say that they do not offer the Razr. So now I’d be down TWO phones!

Sam, thank you for your push. David, I 100% agree with you–and this comes as no surprise to anyone, I’m sure–that we all need mini toasters and Pop Tart dispensers with us wherever we go. Another L.A. anomaly: You can not find non-frosted cherry and blueberry PopTarts! I miss them!

I will draw the line, my friends, at implantable phones. Too creepy! And I’ve had 6 cell phones already (that’s about one per year on average). Imagine them performaing surgery on my head every year to replace my broken “headphone”! No thanky!

Thursday, January 20th, 2005 • 1:07pm • Permalink

Barbie Expounded Thusly:

Barbie will try not to be upset that you did not thank her. She also wonders how you talk on a scooter.

Thursday, January 20th, 2005 • 7:56pm • Permalink

Cowboy D. Expounded Thusly:

I hear tell that y’all can get non-frosted cherry and blueberry PopTarts in Alberta. Pity.

Thursday, January 20th, 2005 • 8:07pm • Permalink

Steve Expounded Thusly:

Ha ha ha! Barbie is nothing if not a crack-up! I hope she runs for president in 2008.

Friday, January 21st, 2005 • 11:12am • Permalink

Barbie Expounded Thusly:

She will and when she wins, she will ban all men named Steve from ever being able to own cell phones or hold an opinion. Barbie has spoken.

Friday, January 21st, 2005 • 7:19pm • Permalink

Steve Expounded Thusly:

Why is Barbie so mean?

Monday, January 24th, 2005 • 10:09am • Permalink

Barbie Expounded Thusly:

For the same reason you are.

Monday, January 24th, 2005 • 11:58am • Permalink

The Wren Forum » Bluetooth and Linen Monkeys Expounded Thusly:

[…] After almost a year and a half, I finally got the cell phone I’ve been wanting. (Blame the U.S. cell phone companies.) […]

Tuesday, November 8th, 2005 • 4:53pm • Permalink • This is a Pingback

The Wren Forum » From 6230 to N73 Expounded Thusly:

[…] I proffer for reference this and this. […]

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006 • 5:03pm • Permalink • This is a Pingback

 

Sorry, I ain't takin' no comments on this page. Deal, y'hear?