The Ranting Wren The Wren Forum Banner
The Glorious Wren The Movie Wren The Photo Wren Old Man Wren

I just got done watching Super Size Me. The movie was very good, and it has me thinking more deeply about some of the food choices I have already taken steps to fix in my own life.

However, that’s not why I’m here tonight. No, there was a part early on in the film where an interviewee is talking about how it’s socially acceptable to chastise someone in a public place for smoking, and not for being overweight. His point was that someone was being told off in public about how horrible smoking is for you and that the smoker should quit, while no one went up to the overweight person to tell them off about how bad overeating is.

While perhaps I’m taking his point and skewing it, I think perhaps what has become publicly acceptable is what has become publicly unacceptable: smoking. Because smoking in public is now not acceptable (in general), that person the man in the movie was talking about was able to go up to the smoker and say, “You shouldn’t do that. It’s bad for you.” That will never happen with the obesity issue for a couple important reasons.

The first and most obvious reason is that smoking befouls the social space. One cigarette can turn a large, clean room into a smelly one. One cigarette can turn a pleasant outdoor meal into a nasty, polluted one if the breeze is blowing the right way. Ignoring the factors of public health and the costs society has to pay for those who die of smoking-related illnesses, whether a person chooses to smoke is up to them, and it’s not up to strangers to tell them otherwise. EXCEPT when that person chooses to do it in a public place where many people gather. Their smoking is not contained within their body, but wafts out to affect their entire surroundings. It’s downright rude to smoke in such situations. Screw their health, they need a lesson in propriety.

As obesity continues to grow (sorry…) in the U.S., we certainly have cause to worry about medical costs to society, just as we do for smoking-related illnesses. However, unlike smoking, obesity does not have a casual effect on others. Many people may find obesity unsightly, but that’s not the same as filling a room with the smoke from one cigarette. There will never be laws banning overweight people from public places.

There are many touchy topics that come up when talking about obesity, and I’m sure, if anyone wanted to try and take the other side on this one, we’d see some of the arguments. But none of them are specific to obesity. A thin person might smell just as bad as an overweight person, for example, or even worse. An overweight person might, in fact, smell just fine and have perfect hygiene. But a smoker, when they smoke, no matter what their hygiene, religious beliefs, political affiliations, manner of dress, or hair color, sends that smoke out so everyone else has to deal with it.

The second of the couple of important reasons is that smoking is, truly, a choice. Yes, eating right is a choice as well, but in this case, food is involved. People have to eat to survive. Because the landscape is littered with easier, cheaper, unhealthy choices, eating healthy food is quite difficult to do. There is no good reason to smoke; it is a purely extraneous activity. Smokers choose to smoke. Addiction to nicotine may keep a majority of smokers from quitting, but the entire activity is not a requirement for biological survival.

Eating-related obesity can also be an addiction, and it may even be a choice as well. But it is linked to a function we have to do to live. A fat, messy, sloppy eater might be a disgusting sight to someone, but if the room is filled with obese people, not all of them, and probably none of them, will be eating like pigs. If the room is filled with people smoking, all of them will be filling the room with smoke.

So there’s my poorly-worded point for today. I thought it was silly for the guy in the movie to compare public smoking to public obesity in the way he did. As health issues, they are both important and, in the end, do affect society. But as for being called out on them in public by someone who just happens to be passing is silly. Neither the smoker nor the overweight person should be told by someone they don’t know how dangerous their habits are.

Okay, now you should go read what TAM has to say about smoking. It’s much funnier than this post, and that makes it more of value to the modern blog reader.

(Oh, look. It’s the second time I’ve linked to Robb’s post. It must really be a quality post.)

4 Comments

Patrick Casey Expounded Thusly:

I agree with you about public smoking and public obesity. But talking about obesity and smoking in general, I’m tired of fat people looking like the victims and smokers looking like the villains.

Theres this new show coming out with the blonde haired guy from queer eye who goes around making fat women fine with being overweight. Now I now obese people shouldnt be sent away on trains but telling them that its ok to have a health problem is not helping anybody.

Suppose this new show comes out with the blonde guy from queer eye where he goes around telling women its ok to smoke. After five days the women are completely secure and comfortable with themselves as smokers. Everyone would be in shock at the ridiculousness right?

Well they are both addictions, and both will kill you. IN public or out of public. And I think they should be thought of in a more similiar fashion.

Friday, January 25th, 2008 • 1:51am • Permalink

Roer Expounded Thusly:

Patrick,
Thank you for your very logical point of view! I do smoke my incredibly light and elegant cigarettes in the few places I am permitted to do so, still endure evil glances from the one non-smoker at the next table, eat extremely healthy, exercise adequately and never have the need to tell anyone how they should live. Yet, -I spend a lot af time on the road- it seems increasingly difficult to find a healthy meal on-the-go. I just see more and more red and yellow, more quick-fix rubbish, and I can’t help myself thinking… If less people supported these unhealthy take-outs, if less people supported having kiddies parties there for the sake of their own laziness only to join smoking people at their house thereafter, with the children , then maybe we could hope for healthier food on-the-go, a healthier approach to life, and minding your own business as well as you possibly can.

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008 • 4:45pm • Permalink

Steve Expounded Thusly:

Both good comments! I just want to add that, to me, smoking in public (meaning where others are present nearby) is not one’s own business, because the smoke from the cigarette befouls the air everyone else around them has to breathe. So really, someone is minding their own business when asking someone else not to smoke in a public place. But I understand… how far can we go with this idea?

How about car pollution? The cars we all drive pollute the air for everyone else who may not drive a car. Is the Civic I drive as guilty of this as those L.A. County school buses that belch thick, visible clouds of fumes? To some, the answer would be yes. How about noise pollution? If an entire neighborhood is being kept awake late into the evening by one apartment full of loud partiers, is that acceptable? At what point is the noise level acceptable vs. being unacceptable? How is that judgement made?

Social responsibility is a tricky subject, especially when a population is more densely compact. When a majority of a population smoked, anyplace and any time, the standards were skewed one way, and anyone wanting to go out to a place with clean air was out of luck. When the new standard drifted to smoking being a nasty, useless, and unhealthy activity, those who still smoke are the ones who are out of luck when they desire to do so around others in public.

Obesity is not the same as any of these more intrusive examples, and I pretty much covered that (inelegantly) in the original post. Smoking is an invasive habit, affecting the space of others. It is not okay, certainly these days, to puff smoke into the face of other people. It may be the case where, some day, it is not okay for cars to belch out poisonous gasses along roads lined with houses and schools and parks. (Already, people think the nasty belching busses and cargo trucks are disgusting compared to newer, less-polluting passenger cars.) Noise pollution is less easy to take a stance on, since noise is not a physical detriment like air pollution. (Though some might argue that not being able to sleep for a few nights thanks to noisy neighbors leads to certain physical repercussions.)

As the population of the planet grows and becomes more crowded, the impact of individuals on one another grows more intense. At what point is it no longer fair for others to befoul the living spaces of others? When must laws dictate what is socially responsible because individuals can’t? It’s a thorny and complicated question, but I feel a good rule to follow is, if one’s actions are legitimately disturbing others, one should choose the more considerate route and make the world that much more livable for everyone.

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008 • 5:30pm • Permalink

Loraine Traverence Expounded Thusly:

Yesterday, a man publicly criticized his girlfriend for smoking . . . he is considerably over weight (obese).

So . . . I “Googled” Smoking vs. Obesity and arrived at Steve’s article from August 2006 . . . without elaborating: BRILLIANT, WELL WRITTEN!

Loraine

Friday, July 10th, 2009 • 9:46am • Permalink

 

Sorry, I ain't takin' no comments on this page. Deal, y'hear?